Jump to content

Talk:Pittsfield, Massachusetts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Surprised

[edit]

I'm as suprised that this article has such as revision history and I am that it exists in the first place. Who would have thought the little town I grew up in would make it to wikipedia.
-Andrew Arace — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.243.4.90 (talk) 20:53, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shaker Village

[edit]

The nicely written and informative section about Hancock Shaker Village might be better placed on the Hancock, Massachusetts page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.28.67.203 (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Details

[edit]

I love Pittsfield. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.232.231.75 (talk) 01:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me, too. That said, I'd like to make sure we get the details in this article right. Most sources seem to agree that Waconah Park was opened in 1919, not 1918. Jim Bouton's site refers to organized baseball at Waconah from 1892 onwards, but that probably meant ball played on the site, not in park as it stands today. Ethanz 18:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The main part of the Baseball section needs at least a reliable source such as James A. Vlasich, A Legend for the Legendary: The Origin of the Baseball Hall of Fame (BGSU 1990) and a link to baseball origins or history, probably removing some content to one of those articles. Doubleday or Cooperstown may be in dire straits and the reference to mlb players born in Pittsfield looks nonstandard ("Gold Glove" and "Outfielder"). I will check project discussion for baseball and locales or communities, but what I expect to find indicated there is a career or two rather than what to do here. 64.48.78.40 19:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

Most of the information on this page belongs in a tourism magazine, not an encyclopedia. The article should be titled, ´´Pittsfield: City of Culture and Art´´ or something similarly bland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.230.21.145 (talk) 14:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aaronlife, I appreciate your attention to detail and your ability to write prose, but prose does not belong in a neutral, factual article. ´´Visitors and residents of Pittsfield alike are marveling at how beautiful the restored river is´´ is irrelevent and cannot be cited. That said, I think the article is in much better shape after all your changes have been made, the only exception being its floridity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.230.21.155 (talk) 11:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Most of the information on this page belongs in a tourism magazine, not an encyclopedia. The article should be titled, ´´Pittsfield: City of Culture and Art´´ or something similarly bland."
what kind of a comment is this (above)? if you look at other cities on wikipedia they also list parks and other attractions, cultural or otherwise; that is appropriate for a page attempting to educate someone who is attempting to visit a town, or at least learn about it and get a sense for it. just because pittsfield isn't as big as say portland, oregon, or NYC or Boston, doesn't mean it doesn't deserve cultural and park listings. when i originally found this page is had very limited information and most of it focused on an extremely depressing view of the pcb issues in pittsfield, which, although noteworthy, are scarcely in the mind of most people who live and or visit pittsfield (i am a long-time resident), the details of which don't seem entirely relevant to an encyclopedia article on a small city; why not detail the fiscal problems created by various mayors, or the illegal garbage tax of the current mayor. personally, I would like to see the pcb section condensed, but i'm respecting those who originally developed it. i would also like to see a picture of downtown pittsfied, or pictures; there was one but it disappeared recently. a good encyclopedia has pictures, anyone know where it went? aaronlife, 6/27/07 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronlife (talk • contribs) 14:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

[edit]

I have attempted to clean up the article, as it was nowhere near standards and left out many things common to most Massachusetts articles. I know it's not the best, so if you have any further cleanup ideas, please feel free! ToddC4176 (talk) 03:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since there is no "Parallelogram Complex" in Pittsfield, I removed it. 12:37, 3 May 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.230.24.30 (talk)

Speaking of "Cleanup"

[edit]

Speaking of "Cleanup", I just want to commend the General Electric folks on the writing of the section pertaining to "environmental issues." The General Electric folks did a good job in writing this section of the article. Nice public relations, GE!!!! Runt (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historic Photos and Notable News

[edit]

5/13/09

I liked what Lenox, Massachusetts did with their page, uploaded scanned postcard images from the public domain, so I undertook a time-consuming, but hopefully, worthwhile project of doing the same. I hope everyone leaves it alone, I'm not sure if i tagged the photos properly, but hopefully the administrators will figure it out. See Lenox, MA for example

I added a noteworthy news article someone told me about recently, I guess it's a big item on Topix and plans are in the works to continue it. This made the TV news awhile back, print media, it's controversial, could put Pittsfield on the map, more controversial than sheep downtown! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronlife (talk • contribs) 07:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Postcard images

[edit]

The scanned postcard images that were added to the Pittsfield, Massachusetts page have long since expired into the public domain, they are from the early 1900s. See Lenox, Massachusetts for example...

Please do not delete these, in many cases there wasn't even a printing company name, these are PUBLIC DOMAIN — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronlife (talk • contribs) 21:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The postcards definitely add to the article, but there are far too many. About four to five would be sufficient - so many images make an article harder to read. The Points of Interest section in particular is too crowded. Also, it is not really appropriate to place a photo gallery in the middle of article prose - galleries should be placed at the end of an article, but in general Wikimedia Commons has replaced Wikipedia as a photo repository/gallery. I won't remove the images just yet, but eventually this does need some cleanup. Cheers, Rai•me 01:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Algonquin image use?

[edit]

As the Algonquins never lived in Massachusetts, I find it strange to see a water colour with Algonquins in it. If the intent were to show Algonquian peoples (which the local Mohicans), and not Algonquins, please either remove this image or replace it with a more appropriate image. CJLippert (talk) 23:12, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I removed it because those people in the picture were from Quebec, far away from Massachusetts. I agree, a picture of Mohegan people belongs there. Johanna-Hypatia (talk) 20:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

references

[edit]

The show Fringe made a reference to this city and a scene took place there in episode 21 of season 3. Maybe there should be a section that lists pop culture/media references. KannD86 (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pittsfield, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pittsfield, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Pittsfield, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Pittsfield, Massachusetts

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Pittsfield, Massachusetts's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "USCensusEst2016":

  • From Barnstable County, Massachusetts: "Population and Housing Unit Estimates". Retrieved June 9, 2017.
  • From Quincy, Massachusetts: "Counties Population Totals Tables: 2010-2016, Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Counties: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016". Retrieved June 10, 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pittsfield, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pittsfield, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intentionally Political

[edit]

The rhetoric on the earliest settlers is intentionally political and derogatory. Words like “brutal” and “invaders” or “invaded” used several times. Not to mention that there are no listed sources for much of it. Were the Boston merchant and Livingston the land speculator from Albany even kinsman? Where did that come from? Just unnecessary rhetoric meant to portray one side as bad; this should be neutral. 216.193.154.160 (talk) 07:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion is not a weighted word. It simply means that soliders enter a foreign land with militaristic intent. SomeCatOnTheInternet (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pittsfield,_Massachusetts&oldid=1257090873"