Talk:Haar wavelet

Can we ditch the ASCII art and get a proper graphic? It took me half a minute to figure out that it was a representation of a graph on a cartesian coordinate system. - 19:58, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. You don't even need to log in, although there are several reasons why you might want to. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. --W(t) 20:04, 2005 May 23 (UTC)

Merger

Seems logical since Haar-like features doesnt seem notable on its own and content could easily be merged here. Hadrianheugh (talk) 04:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please allow the editors of this strange article to expand it first and make it comprehensible. Every month 20 or so papers are published in scientific or semi-scientific journals that apply wavelets or wavelet-like ideas to some area in engineering, esp. image and speech recognition. Most of those ideas or modifications of standard algorithms are not notable enough for inclusion, except they could get get a strong and long-living support/care from several editors.--LutzL (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I left this message in talk:Haar-like features 62.93.183.215

”Hi. Just came up to read about the subject (I study bioinformatics) and found the article fine (needs some improvement though). As the previous commenter I don't see it appropiate to merge it with Haar-wavelet. Many people, like me, needs more information about the topic and is able to understand this subject, but does not have any idea about what a wavelet is. Keep it simple please.″

62.93.183.215 (talk) 09:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think Haar-like features should redirect here, as they are completely different topics. And since Haar-like features are one of the more common (and successful) approaches to machine vision, I would consider that notable. On the other hand, I do think Haar transform should point here. Maghnus (talk) 08:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Maghnus, we should merge Haar transform into this article.

I also think Haar transform should be merged here. Thenub314 (talk) 06:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really a complete system? What about $t\mapsto 1$ and $t\mapsto \psi _{0,0}(t)$ ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.36.163 (talk) 08:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Haar wavelet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Rademacher function" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rademacher function has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 13 § Rademacher function until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 17:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]