Talk:NHL Plus-Minus Award

NHL Plus-Minus Award is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 27, 2007	Featured list candidate	Promoted
November 19, 2007	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
February 28, 2009	Featured topic removal candidate	Kept
November 23, 2016	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
Current status: Featured list

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Awards Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

actual stats...

it would be interesting to have the actual stats (as in what was their plus-number). it would make this article more of a resource. Themindset 17:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not sure how accurate or reliable these are, but this page has plus/minus totals: [1] 71.237.38.227 04:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--> Peter Forsberg isn't still active and he is highlighted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.3.141.174 (talk) 18:22, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 18:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Naming history

I've added the history of names for the award as far the NHL Official Guide and Record Book tells me. The 1989-90 book (covering 1988-89) has no entry in the awards section for plus/minus, which explains that season's listing. I also made the somewhat bold step of changing what the current name for the trophy is, because I can't find anything reliable that says that it's being sponsored by Alka-Seltzer again. A search for 'redden rozsival "bud light" 2006' returns far more results than 'redden rozsival alka 2006', which returns mostly results based on this article. So if someone can find a definitive source for the Alka-Seltzer naming, please post it. Aottley 01:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mm, not only is the award not mentioned in the 89-90 book, but they wipe out all mention of the Emery Edge award winners of past years. Of course, there are about two pages worth of ephemeral Dodge awards, showing who was the King Sponsor de jour ... Ravenswing 06:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Individual or Team

The first paragraph, explaining the award, says it's a players' award. Later on, it mentions teams. I would suggest instead it would be worded more like "...won 4 times by an Edmonton Oiler, 3 times each by a Philadelphia Flyer,..." etc. Also, if you're going to make such a summary, why not list all teams and the count, perhaps in tabular form? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rchandra (talk • contribs)

I addressed this here: [2] --maclean 19:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1998-99 - who won?

Most sources (all the sources I can find actually) say LeClair. [3][4][5][6] Yet Karpovtsev did have a better plus/minus (+38) compared to LeClair (+36). The only reason I can think of that LeClair would be given the award over Karpovtsev is Karpovtsev only played in 58 games with the Rangers and Maple Leafs. Is there a minimum number of games a player must play in order to win the award? --Ulf17 (talk) 18:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neither mind, I see it is 60 games. I will make the appropriate changes. --Ulf17 (talk) 18:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what if there is a tie?

there is no mention in the article that says how they chose the winner when a tie occurs, which, according to the footnotes, happens ALOT of times —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.41.93.242 (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1994-95 season

Is there info what was the game limit in that season? Obviously with the lockout wiping part of the season (the schedule was 48) the limit can't be 60.BleuDXXXIV (talk) 12:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discontinued

This award was discontinued. hockeyDB says it was last awarded in 2008. NHL.com doesn't list it among the awards for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, or 2013. --Parkfly3 (talk) 08:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NHL Plus-Minus Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008152313/http://www.nhl.cz/index.php?view=clanek&lng=CZ&short=TROF&id=113941&flag=4 to http://www.nhl.cz/index.php?view=clanek&lng=CZ&short=TROF&id=113941&flag=4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological Order?

Why aren't the winners tables in chronological order? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bevstarrunner (talk • contribs) 10:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]