User talk:193.167.132.66

Notability of Ashfield (webcomic)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ashfield (webcomic), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ashfield (webcomic) is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ashfield (webcomic), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ashfield (webcomic)

A tag has been placed on Ashfield (webcomic) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 07:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ashfield (webcomic)

I have nominated Ashfield (webcomic), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashfield (webcomic). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Trusilver 07:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dixon Hill

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dixon Hill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --EEMIV (talk) 11:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Starfleet Corps of Engineers, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Starfleet Corps of Engineers" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Data disk listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Data disk. Since you had some involvement with the Data disk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Dixon Hill listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dixon Hill. Since you had some involvement with the Dixon Hill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --EEMIV (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Powermasters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Powermasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powermasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 02:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Scorponok for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scorponok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scorponok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:46, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Graphics BASIC

The article Graphics BASIC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only found primary source or trivial mention of the subject. Lacks significant coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:44, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

---