User talk:203.26.206.129

Proposed deletion of Adelaide Youth Orchestra

The article Adelaide Youth Orchestra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guidelines, no inline citations.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Claritas (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RECEO

The article RECEO has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

mo sources, hard to find sources, does not seem to be particularly notable (minor commerical strategy)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Errant Tmorton166^(Talk) 19:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joanne Lees for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joanne Lees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne Lees(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Egg Centric 20:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GoneAM-ME listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect GoneAM-ME. Since you had some involvement with the GoneAM-ME redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 13:38, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adelaide Youth Orchestra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adelaide Youth Orchestra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelaide Youth Orchestra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JayJay^{What did I do?} 02:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joanne Lees for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joanne Lees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne Lees (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Darrelljon (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.