Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talumena

Nonsense? Unclear reference to a work of fiction? I have no idea. There's just enough possibility of something real that someone can salvage that I chose not to speedy-delete. -- Jmabel 06:03, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Google suggests it is a language created for a fictional book or something similar. But it doesn't appear to be a significant one. Average Earthman 10:58, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Google for "Known Passing World" gets lots Wikipedia mirrors and other exact copies of the same material, but nothing else at all. Based on that, I'm not sure the fictional world exists at all except as a setting for the language. Either way, not notable, delete. Isomorphic 15:37, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like conlangs are the new micronation. Delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998 18:46, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
Yech. Delete. PMC 21:32, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete!It has value simply as a constructed/invented language. Grammar & phonetics make sense, but with minor errors.Check out story from site.Looks like a work in progress.People used to diss Tolkien for inventing languages,you know.Even now-MojoWorkin'