Talk:CHAN-DT

Vancouver Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vancouver, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VancouverWikipedia:WikiProject VancouverTemplate:WikiProject VancouverVancouver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Is there any reason whatsoever that this page is at CHAN (a name which maybe 3 people in BC use) instead of BCTV? Kirjtc2 03:43, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Cause that's the call sign. User:24.87.116.36

And these "3 people" would be who? It is because that is there call letters, as already answered. Other stations searches on this website are referred to by station identification ("call letters") too. a search for "bctv" will re-direct to you to CHAN. User:Xm2631

The current logo used on the wikipedia page for CHAN is not the logo used On Air. CHAN (BCTV- Global) simply uses the Global logo for the ident on air. Shouldn't this be reflected as such. This is sort of like the CIVT logo situation too I suppose. I don't know. Just a thought. 24.81.146.253 03:33, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Digital

According to the page, digital was expected September 2006. It's now November. Any news to update this? Might be good to at least state it in past tense now. User:pbryan 2006-11-03 09:46 PST.

Early station photos

What happened to all the neat photos from the station's early history? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mjlarochelle (talk • contribs) 05:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chan8.png

Image:Chan8.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Global-redblack.gif

Image:Global-redblack.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If CHAN has separate transmitters

If CHAN has separate transmitters, does CHEK? I don't get CHEK over-the-air at all, so I wouldn't know. If it does, then I think that the category "List of Transmitters of CHAN-TV" could be changed to "List of Transmitters of CHAN-TV or CHEK-TV". There could be a second table within that category that is similar in format to the table for CHAN-TV.

Fair use rationale for Image:GlobalBC.png

Image:GlobalBC.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Old Global TV Logo.svg

The image Image:Old Global TV Logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CHAN's ratings

Global BC's local newscasts are currently number one in Vancouver and British Columbia, and there are some recent ratings to prove this.

In the first two weeks of September, Global’s 6 p.m. Newshour averaged close to 300,000 viewers each night; CTV at six, I’m told, averaged 69,000; and, CBC at 6 p.m. only 23,000… a distant third and apparently no boost at all from last Fall. (Although interstingly, CBC at 5 p.m is up 5,000 viewers to 18,000. Hmm.)

At 5 p.m. … Global pulls in a 2.1 SHARE ; CTV a 1.0; and CBC .o2

At 6 p.m. Global a still whopping 5.8 SHARE; CTV 1.9; and CBC .o2
— Harvey Oberfeld

http://harveyoberfeld.ca/blog/ctv-runs-first-class-series-but-global-still-rules-the-roost/
Also of further interest: http://harveyoberfeld.ca/blog/parsons-fails-to-make-much-impact/ http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?t=4836 http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?t=2688 http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?t=1223 http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?t=319 http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?t=230 http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?t=227 http://www.viewers.ca/discuss/showthread.php?t=220 http://hinto.tripod.com/newswatch/yvr-tv/archives-octnov2001.html єmarsee • Speak up! 03:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number of hours in the newscast output according to schedule

When I took a look at this article, which was chosen at random, my findings revealed to have some minor schedule in regards to the number of hours in a newscast. As it turned out, there were some number of hours that were a bit off on the weekdays, so I corrected portion of the article according to the schedule as appropriate. In regards to the weekends, I was not sure of the actual number of hours it airs on the weekends; particularly the noon newscast - those to be adjusted later. [3] CHAK 001 ^{(Improvements? Please let me know!)} 08:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CHAN-DT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131119235800/http://digitaltv.gc.ca/eng/1298734754616/1298734754746 to http://digitaltv.gc.ca/eng/1298734754616/1298734754746

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

7850 Enterprise Opening

There is only one website listing when the facility opened, which had occurred in 1962 according to the website. The previous edit had mentioned "in early 1961", and for a fact, this information is from a television film that the station produced open it's launch, but it is only attainable through the station itself, so for the time being, we can use the referenced website for the year that the facility opened. ^[1] There is also another video, which is shown on youtube where it is mistaknely mentioned that the facility was opened in 1960, which is slightly inaccruate. ^[2] Moonlightfocus (talk) 06:43, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ [1]
^ [2]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:BCTV (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [1]

[2] [2]

[1]

[2]