Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Calla Lily

Two photos of a calla lily

Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 06:54, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Support the regular pic. The close-up isn't helpful in identifying the flower and thus doesn't provide useful info. Mgm|^(talk) 07:36, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Support first version. brian0918  12:25, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Support first version. Might be improved by evening out the crop, but not really necessary. —Korath (Talk) 15:53, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Sorry, just not anything spectacular. No interesting angles, not interesting enough use of line, shape, texture, etc. It's a nice flower, but not featured picture worthy. jacobolus (t) 04:53, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Agree with jacobolus. Junes 08:22, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Agree with Junes. —Jonas Olson 10:10, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Support the first version. Though plain, the flower, the central focus, is strikingly clear and aesthetically pleasing. - Sango123 00:12, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
Support first too, agree with Sango Circeus 02:18, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Doesn't have featured pic qualities. Enochlau 09:57, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty picture but not extraordinary. Pollinator 21:50, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Not promoted +6 / -5 -- Solipsist 19:54, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)