Talk:The Shnookums & Meat Funny Cartoon Show

Untitled

Is this real? Tell me this isn't real. I have the horrible feeling this exists. Jwrosenzweig 19:33, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Oh, it existed, all right! It wasn't bad, either, despite what you might be led to believe by the brief Wiki description. Yes, it was a Ren and Stimpy knock-off (but let's face it, so was Spongebob Squarepants and a bazillion other 90's cartoons). Yes, the Schnookums and Meat characters weren't especially entertaining.

However, the further away you got from them, the better the show became. Pith Possum was an amusing parody of Batman (the 60's TV show, not the 90's cartoon) and Tex Tinstar was absolutely hilarious, a satire of old cowboy movies starring a boneheaded cowpoke and a Mexican bandito with a decidedly British accent. It was a wonderfully demented cross between The Lone Ranger, Eek! The Cat, and Dudley Do-Right, with the best parts of those three shows.

Too bad the producers didn't have their priorities straight when they made this... because of the emphasis on Schnookums and Meat, the show will forever be remembered as "just another Ren and Stimpy clone," and the true genius hidden within will be lost to the sands of time. --M.Neko 11:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

It seems to exist and looks like a copy of Ren and Stimpy. TvTome page. Secretlondon 19:39, Feb 23, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks, Secretlondon....well, I guess I'll just classify this under "True, Frightening but". :-) Jwrosenzweig 19:41, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

It would be helpful if the article said more than it was a "show". Could be a Broadway show for all the reader will learn here - Marshman 19:45, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Looks good now. -- user:zanimum October 18, 2005

Welker the great

Should there be any mention of the work that Frank Welker did for this particular animated program? Sochwa 20:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Poptart001 798.jpg

Image:Poptart001 798.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Disappointing Article

This article is surprisingly slight. The segment sections need to be beefed up and there's very little about the characters. Not to be a hypocrite, I did add some to the S&M and Pith Possum sections just now. I recall something about someone (likely Bill Kopp) complaining that the generic titles of P² eps made keeping track of which episode was which almost impossible and requiring episode synopsis to be listed along with the titles in their paperwork. However, I didn't put that in the article because I don't know where I read it, don't know who made the comment, and it conceivably (but probably not) might have even been in regard to another show with generic titles (though I doubt it.) As it was I wrote:

In a parody of cartoon parents and caretakers always viewed from the waist and legs down (such as Tom & Jerry's Mammy Two Shoes, Muppet Babies' Nanny, and Roger Rabbit's Mrs. Herman), Husband and Wife literally do not have upper bodies - only waists and legs - and their voices emanate from the spaces where one would expect to find mouths.

Before remembering that it was Cow & Chicken I was remembering. That was a close one. I hate doing this from memory!

Could someone with access to the episodes themselves try to add to the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.80.47 (talk) 02:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Shnookums and Meat Funny Cartoon Show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://eek-the-cat.com/interviews/billkopp.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://eek-the-cat.com/interviews/eek!.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)