Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possibility
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus so article defaults to "keep." Joyous 02:55, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
Unresearched stub with no possibility of becoming encyclopedic. ➥the Epopt 16:16, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I'm not sure whether or not this could become encyclopaedic, but this isn't useful anyway. Redirect to logical possibility until someone has something to say on the matter. --fvw* 17:02, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)
- Keep. Important topic, growing stub. Possible cleanup but that page is overloaded so I think not. Logical possibility is a technical article, and not a suitable redir for this. Andrewa 20:26, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. As presented, this description is nn nonsense. Wyss 23:01, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, could do with expansion. Megan1967 02:57, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, there is a possibility it will become encyclopedic. ;) -Ld | talk 21:25, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.