Talk:Heckler & Koch G36
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Heckler & Koch G36 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Netherlands use
[edit]What unit of Dutch police forces (I know (almost) for certain not the military) (could be Special Intervention units, but I've only seen foto's of them using MP5's and P90's) uses the G36, and which source was used?
G36 picture looks false
[edit]The G36 picture shows a Marui G36C airsoft gun, not the real gun. Just have a look at the fire selector or a the bullet magazine... Guerric
Material section
[edit]I removed the bit mentioning the reciprocating parts move on steel rails inside the receiver. The receiver is steel reinforced, but the bolt carrier does not ride on any steel, only plastic or more specifically, nylon 66. I have an HK SL8-1 and a G36K parts kit I can verify this with if questioned.
Useless... a political statement, not a technical one
[edit]It says early in the article "After a prolonged investigation, the German defense ministry decided to phase out the rifle, with minister of defense Ursula von der Leyen declaring the weapon "useless" " Should this be changed slightly, as although she called it 'useless' from what I have seen from firearm experts, who know more that von der Leyen does, and we know the German government don't like HK and the G-36 met the German requirement. Check out Forgotten Weapons channel on YouTube. Does the opening of the article suggest, without evidence, that the G-36 is useless? I think it does. It is right to mention von der Leyen's political view, and right to mention it had issues in the heat. But that is not the same as saying it is 'useless'. Chwyatt (talk) 11:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Although I will happily agree with you about your kind distinction between the political and technical point of view, but what do call one a firearm that can't hit the broad side of a barn when hot? Where the hit rate drops to a mere 7% (instead of the required 90%) when the temperature increases by just 30 °C. We are talking about a 50-60 cm circle at 100 metres (about 19-24 MOA) after firing just 90 rounds/3 magazines. Accuracy of a typical assault rifle should be in the range of a 2-4 MOA.
- If you are shot at you may probably not have the time to wait for your rifle to cool down before returning fire. That's as close as it gets to technically 'useless', doesn't it? Pepysshack (talk) 20:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Spelling
[edit]The article currently has a mixture of spellings, which isn't ideal. Based on this early revision, it appears that it was written in (mostly) British English. According to MOS:RETAIN, I think it should standardise on that spelling variant. Does anyone disagree? 84.65.59.217 (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- C-Class Germany articles
- Mid-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles