Talk:Martha Mitchell effect

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Another case

I seem to vaguely recall another famous case: a U.S. naval officer who insisted that he was being followed everywhere by Israeli secret service agents was committed to a military psychiatric hospital, where he committed suicide. Later, his claims were found to have been real. Timeframe: 1960s or 70s? Can anyone pin this one down? -- The Anome 10:07, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

An article by Mayerhoff et al (link to PubMed entry) is a similar case, but I've not yet tracked down the original so don't know the details yet. - Vaughan 10:50, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Is it worthwhile to point out similarities between this and the Cassandra Syndrome? -R. fiend 20:28, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I'll change if not dissuaded

Any patient, they explain, can be misdiagnosed by clinicians, even one with a history of paranoid delusions.

It appears this should read "especially one with a history of paranoid delusions". Why am I wrong? --Gtg207u (talk) 21:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Howe about

Any patient, they explain, can be misdiagnosed by clinicians, even one withOUT a history of paranoid delusions. 195.137.93.129 (talk) 21:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed original research tag

I've removed the OR tag from the page as it's just a description of what's already written in the published, referenced sources. Full disclosure: I am the co-author on one of the papers, but I wasn't the editor who added it as a reference to this page. - Vaughan (talk) 15:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the beginning of the Discussion section, "According to Bell et. al,", is unsourced. What is the citation here? Isn't this frowned upon (unsourced citations could be bogus). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.201.21.84 (talk) 18:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day

Is this article giving undue weight to the claims of folks who otherwise shouldn't be given such consideration? 24.240.67.157 (talk) 03:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add Arnold Juklerød under see also?

I.e. from that page.. "On 11 August 1995 Arnold Juklerød received an unconditional admission from the Ministry of Education and Research that his "delusions" in the Holtane case had been correct." Ybllaw (talk) 18:28, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Made this change as it seems not far fetched. Ybllaw (talk) 11:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]