Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New zeland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. A redirect to New Zealand was subsequently created. —Korath (Talk) 01:20, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
- 01:54, Mar 18, 2005 DavidWBrooks deleted New zeland (vandalism)
Unnecessary, profane, speedy deletion
- A redirect profane? Unless of course you didn't mean New_zealand but New_zeland. Speediest delete. Chris 01:09, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect New Zealand. Niteowlneils 01:49, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect. Common misspelling. android↔talk 03:28, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect. Agree this is likely a common misspelling. Jonathunder 05:02, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)
- Someone has redirected it now. Mgm|(talk) 09:27, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
- I should hope it's not a common misspeling, becaus that wold maek me shuddre abuot the wolrd's ecudation. Nevertheless, delete and replace with redirect. Radiant_* 09:35, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Oh come off it. Iff there was a redirect from Yankee land to United States, would it be allowed to stay? Most probably. It's now an issue for WP:RFD, and I say that it's not doing any harm, so it should be kept. Alphax τεχ 15:44, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect -- to New Zealand. Common misspelling. Not everyone is a spelling genius. Wikipedia must be usable by all, even those who can't spell, if it expects mainstream success. - Longhair | Talk 13:02, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.