User talk:PSYCH
your contributions to Wikipedia
[edit]Hi Psych, I've recently reviewed your most recent contributions. I've noticed a worrisome trend. Of your last 100 edits, 11 of them have been in the article-space (5 of those in article talk). Are you here to contribute to wikipedia? 89% of your effort is being spent on your conflict with User:Xtra. Is this because you have a grudge? Or do you find it fun? It seems to me your wasting a lot of your personal time on this. ---J.Smith 20:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Psych and J.Smith, just as a third party comment, I am on and off wikipedia not very seriously - pretty much I only make minor corrections when I see mistakes, I don't try to write articles. As such I've never had personal encounters with editors before, yet in the last two days when I made minor corrections to two different Australian articles I have had User:Xtra constantly revert (five times) even after I put a section on the discussion pages (which so far has had positive responses outside User:Xtra). His dismissive and consistent reverting without allowing discussion has wasted more of my time on wikipedia than I have spent before, so I understand how Psych may be caught up. It is a sad indictment of wikipedia if you have to tell newcomers "don't try to improve Australian articles that touch on politics because one user will constantly revert you". Sad mouse 04:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)