Talk:Ovidie

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ovidie article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Macwhiz, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 19 March 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Ovidie be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

This article looks more like a fan page than an encyclopedia article: content is indeed overwhelmingly positive, unsourced and does not explain why this person is important enough to appear on Wikipedia. This violates Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons : Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space. 82.233.123.121 07:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pretty POV article, overwhelmingly positive and not neutral at all, needs refinement. -CunningLinguist 07:08, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Important enough to appear on Wikipedia?" The standard is not "important enough." It is inherent scholarly interest. As sexology is an academic discipline, and the casts, production and content of adult films are a significant part of the discipline, actors as prominent as the subject of this article definitely qualify as being "significant enough" to apear on Wikipedia.Coloneldoctor (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the Colonel and think he is a genius of unparalleled stature. Whatever happened to you, anyway? The world is growing stupid without your input. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.137.178 (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with the Colonel, and wonder what ever happened to him. I'm not sure Wikipedia is grand enough to earn his favor anyway. Long live the Colonel Doctor! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.156.164 (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ovidie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151120041521/http://www.metronews.fr/blog/ovidie/ to http://www.metronews.fr/blog/ovidie/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

official name

refused to give her real name to the press Is that so relevant that it has to be the first sentence, given that apparently she changed her mind about it? Or would she prefer to remain pseudonymous but has been doxed? --188.101.94.74 (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]