Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinan Incident
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 01:47, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
This page should be deleted. This page may infringe human rights, because this page is not based on a neutral position. China and Japan disagree about understanding of history between both countries, and Japan has been proposing China to hold debates on this historical problem.
- (nominated by User:60.36.98.230). Grutness...wha?
- See Wikipedia:Content disclaimer. Gazpacho
- Keep, obviously... What's the general policy on anon VfDs? Chiacomo 05:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Same as for others - allowed, as long as it's done in Good faith (but anon votes tend to be discounted). Also, keep this one. Radiant_* 14:36, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable incident in Chinese history - if there are problems with POV should be listed on appropriate page. BTW, VFD template is missing. Capitalistroadster 06:51, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, improve verity and NPOV. EvilPhoenix 07:00, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep, Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
- Stong Keep. Notable incident, if there are differences of opinion on what actually occured then that should be reflected in the article, not deleted. Average Earthman 08:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. if there's an international difference of opinion over this, it simply makes it more noteworthy. The row between China and Japan should be written about on the page. If the nominator is concerned about the point of view of the article, s/he should add the {{NPOV}} template, rather than nominating this notable and encyclopaedic article for deletion. Grutness...wha? 09:28, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If it's not NPOV, that's a separate issue. And the Japanese government's stated "understanding" regarding Japan's actions in China during WWII has proven to be demonstrably uncredible and even at times knowingly mendacious. Nateji77 12:10, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve. Gazpacho 22:29, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Neutralitytalk 00:42, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Whoever thinks that he/she can delete history is a joke him/herself. --Miorea 20:26, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.