User talk:Blindfreddy84/Archive1
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 12:31, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This article currently describes the BoltWatch website as "Contrary discussion of Bolt's opinion pieces and fora". I think critical would be more grammatical and more accurate. I'm planning to tighten up the sentences about Webdiary in the near future; unless you object, I'll make this change as well.
or radical
[edit]i think or radical was being used as an alternate description, rather than another word for left wing. everyone knows that there a radicals on both sides. Xtra 02:58, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Fair enough, (I will admit that I didn't know the initial meaning) although in the scheme of things the term now is a bit redundant. (i.e. 19th Century) it think now it has changed meaning. Much like the initial meaning of the word "conservatism".Blindfreddy84 11:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)