Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple Penetration
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:30, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:30, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Porn dicdef. Alai 06:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Group sex, where it already has a mention. —Korath (Talk) 07:02, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, dictionary definition. Megan1967 07:58, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, more than a definition. Incidentally group sex has a different description. Kappa 09:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Group sex, as Korath said. Jonathunder 04:28, 2005 Apr 12 (UTC)
- Redirect and Merge I think both are not correct, but by combining them you might have something that is closer to correct. Any porn stars following this who can clear this up? ;-) Vegaswikian 06:05, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, this entry is more than a definition and has the potential for further development. ElfWord 09:15, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- More potential than double penetration, which has been hanging around quite happily as a redirect to group sex since 08:26, May 9, 2003? —Korath (Talk) 13:59, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
- I bet double penetration would be featured article status by now if it hadn't been redirected. :) Kappa 14:35, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- More potential than double penetration, which has been hanging around quite happily as a redirect to group sex since 08:26, May 9, 2003? —Korath (Talk) 13:59, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to something suitable. (I don't know what, not having any experience with it myself...) Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:00, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Merge & Redirect to Group sex. If the definition in that page is different, then rewrite its entry to mention the fact that there are two possible interpretations for this expression. VladMV ٭ talk 15:05, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.