Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why did Hitler attack the Soviet Union

Reads like a philosophy or history text. Author even asks to "discuss" the different paragraphs. Conjecture or...? - Lucky 6.9 16:27, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Delete. The title is inherently opinionated. Wiki is not the place for theories. blankfaze | •• 16:33, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I think I see what the author was trying. I think he or she was attempting to list all the theories offered up by historians as to why Hitler launched his attack (and "Discuss" is probably "Discussion"), but the lemma of the article is too cumbersome, and the article isn't particularly scholarly. Better would be "According to Marxist historians such as ...." for each of these things, and better still would be the whole thing put into an article in the WW2 tree. Geogre 18:02, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep, under a neutral title. Nikola 18:19, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Some info should be and cleaned up, but belongs under a different title. (Not sure which, atm) -- siroxo 02:36, Jun 18, 2004 (UTC)
This orphaned article reads like a personal essay. Keep if 1) moved to a more encyclopedic title, 2) turned into an article that references published scholarly studies on this topic and 3) linked in to the WWII series. Rossami 02:00, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Article titles probably shouldn't be in the form of questions, and articles themselves shouldn't be written like history class handouts. Any information we want to keep should probably we copied to WWII or another appropriate topic. -Seth Mahoney 21:37, Jun 18, 2004 (UTC)
Keep, under something expanded like "World War II German-Soviet Relations" or somesuch. It could grow. Jxg 02:34, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Unless and until this article is edited into something that's deserving of an independent page, there's no reason to keep it. Acegikmo1 17:04, Jun 20, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. this should be already discussed in World War II/History of Germany. It doesnt deserve its own article. --Jia ng 17:06, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)