Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reelin
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled Reelin.
This page is kept as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to keep the article.
Orphaned, author self-describes as questionable content. Listed on Cleanup for some time with no attention given.
- Keep and stubify. I will when I have time, no hurry IMO, the article is substandard but not scandalously so and we have lots that are scandalous and survive those OK. Reelin appears to be on the level, so a good topic. Andrewa 00:34, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Refactored and stubified. Andrewa 19:50, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
- It needs alot of work, the conjecture needs to be edited out. But it does look like a valid topic. I'm gonna agree with Andrewa, keep and stubify; there apears to be potential for a good article. --Starx 15:09, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.