User talk:Goldberg

Welcome!

Hello, Goldberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 05:36, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration

Following the various tos-and-fros on WP:VIP, I have made a request for arbitration. You are one of a handful of users in the "Various" request. Sockatume 21:49, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Request withdrawn; turns out that the user accused of being a sockpuppet has been blocked, therefore resolving the issue. Sockatume 22:05, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Three revert rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Viriditas 03:00, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Yasser Arafat

Hi, please discuss major changes for this article on the talk page. Otherwise, you'll most likely get reverted. - Ta bu shi da yu 21:01, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Viriditas

Removed abusive comment, added by Goldberg. There's no need for that. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:12, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks against Viriditas. Calling his edits anti-sematic is uncivil and is a violation of the wikipedia policy "No personal attacks". If you think he's broken any rules, simply report them along with the proof and let others take care of it. Breaking the rules yourself to make a point is not going to help. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 19:50, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

I agree with this. Your edit at [1] was totally uncalled for, and you should not have edited Viriditas' talk page. - Ta bu shi da yu 23:22, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Goldberg

Look, don't vandalise user pages. If I catch you doing it again I'll put a block of an entire month on you. You don't appear to be editing in good faith. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:35, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Also vandalizing a page as a response is not the proper course of action. If you think the edit was out of line, report it. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 12:25, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Sockpuppets and the 3RR

[From Goldberg] Who the hell are SWAdair/Milgram/Wiesenthaler?

Must be the anti-semite Jewbacca. [End of Goldberg]

Please see this notice that I placed on my talk page. If this account is used again to violate the 3RR, it will be blocked. SWAdair | Talk 08:45, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Can you believe this idiotic garbage? These accusations violate a load of rules. They falsely accuse us of being the same person, imply that I am a liar, falsely accuse us of violating the three revert rule, violate the "assume good faith" principle, and bully us and threaten us with sanctions. Who do these editors think they are? This is like the Milgram experiment where they give some losers a little bit of power and they quickly become Nazis. --Wiesenthaler 19:06, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Viriditas | Talk 01:47, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 04:38, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]