Talk:Johannes Trithemius

Occult Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Johannes Trithemius received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Steganographia

His most famous work is Steganographia (written c.1499; published Frankfurt, 1606), a work superficially on cryptography, but containing a hidden treatise on black magic; this work lent its name to the modern field of steganography.

More or less copied from Talk:Steganography in the hope of greater exposure:

"I was under the impression that this claim - orginally made by the Catholic Church - had been refuted. It really is about cryptography - or more generally, 15th century information security, since it branches into peripheral areas such as training couriers to memorise messages. In particular, the so-called spells in Book III were shown by Jim Reed to be cryptograms. In fact many sites today invert the sense of the quote above, and say that it is ostensibly about magic but really about crypto. However I don't know all the details, so does anyone know if there are any parts of the book that are definitively about black magic?" Securiger 06:47, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

The only stuff I've read about Trithemius is in David Kahn's The Codebreakers, where he says that Steganographia was in three books — the last one in particular contained no reference to cryptography but rather various occult things — and that Polygraphia was his major contribution to cryptography. I haven't heard of Jim Reed's work, is it online? — Matt 09:15, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Yes. Try [1] for links to articles, and [2] for a news article. Securiger 12:02, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)

In fact now I've gone and re-read Jim's article, my uncertainty evaporates; I will edit the article. Securiger 12:18, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)

OK Jsimtech

Sources?

There are no sources for any of the information presented in the main body of the article. If the text is to be at all useful some sources would be helpful. Can anyone help? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.192.88.252 (talk • contribs) 11:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Much of it is referenced at the Hill Monastic library site, which holds several Trithemius first editions. This was one of our external links; unfortunately, the page had moved on that site so the link 404'ed, but I have updated it and you should be able to have a look know. It is a fascinating site if you are interested in incunabula or palaeography. -- Securiger 09:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First couple of lines

Of most articles about a person, say briefly what their profession was/what they are noteable for. Sort of a summary even of the lead. I thin that's important because I'd only hear the name and knew nothing about him, searched it, and didn't know what he was noteable for before I read all the lead. The lead of this article is possibly too long too.Merkinsmum 00:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

links and connections

Note there is no link to the Paracelsus page, nor is JT mentioned in that article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.172.223 (talk) 17:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steganographia (part 2)

(As it is many years since the earlier exchange)

'Until recently...' - when? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Johannes Trithemius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johannes Trithemius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331051844/http://www.hmml.org/exhibits10/Trithemius/Introduction.html to http://www.hmml.org/exhibits10/Trithemius/Introduction.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]