Talk:Paraconsistent mathematics

It would be nice to see an example as [1] is not very helpful. My guess is that it is unhelpful. --Henrygb 22:10, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Editorial notes

(NOTE: I have removed the following material from the article and placed it here, where it should have been to start. I do not explicitly endorse this material. I am merely placing it in its proper location. Strikerforce^Talk 16:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC))

Editors Note: I am an advanced Cambridge University Press scholar and University of California, Berkeley, Computer Development Unix Development team member who, finding it necessary to explore in depth the new disciplines of Paraconsistent Math and Logic, and discovering that the Wiki article on Paraconsistent Math was terribly underdeveloped and unedited for ten years, decided to spearhead its growth until it equals in scope and depth its parallel article "Paraconsistent Logic" and might even rival the rich content of The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

But I am ignorant of Wiki markup and editorial practices and need assistance from Master Editors who are also familiiar with Paraconsistency. Please advise.

I would like to assist in developing this dormant stub into a full article that will parallel Paraconsistent Logic. I retain extensive material in this area that qualify me to spearhead the project. Although I have decades of writing and editing experience in books, journal, newspapers and online, I am new to Wiki, so I'll need markup advice. Although I am busy with works for Cambridge University and computer programs for UC Berkeley, I vow to free the time necessary to evolve this article to the fullness and significance it deserves.

Discussed on wikiproject math

Discussed on wikiproject math, here.   Boris Tsirelson (talk) 08:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)