User talk:Cpk1971

The role of the sentinel

Small world. :-)--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 17:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Des Moines Memorial Drive

The article Des Moines Memorial Drive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Road does not establish WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 17:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Des Moines Memorial Drive for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Des Moines Memorial Drive, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Des Moines Memorial Drive until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Admrboltz (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gap wedge for deletion

The article Gap wedge is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gap wedge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marcus Qwertyus 00:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]