User talk:Agnte

Australian collaboration of the fortnight

Hi. You voted for Sport in Australia in the Australian collaboration of the fortnight. It has now been selected for the current fortnight. We also need new nominations for the next round. Thankyou. --Scott Davis ^Talk 09:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bulletin

Bruce Bennett et al, The Oxford Literary History of Australia, OUP Melbourne 1998
Geoffrey Dutton, The Literature of Australia, Penguin, Melbourne 1964
Vance Palmer, The Legend of the Nineties, MUP Melbourne 1954
Patricia Rolfe, The Journalistic Javenlin: An Illustrated History of the Bulletin, Wildcare Press, Sydney 1979.
William Wilde et al, The Oxford Companion to Australian Literature, OUP, Melbourne 1985

Adam 12:05, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne gangland killings

Hi Agnte.

Domenico "Mick" Italiano rather than Domenico "Mick Gatto" appears to be implicated in the murder of John Furlan in 1998.

http://www.melbournecrime.bizhosting.com/john.furlan.htm could replace http://www.melbournecrime.bizhosting.com/jfurlan.htm as the current reference to John Furlan's murder.

Wikipedia article shows:

Timeline of deaths

1998

"On August 3, John Furlan, a 48 year old motor mechanic from Coburg was killed by a car bomb in his Subaru Liberty outside his home. Domenico "Mick" Gatto was treated as a suspect since he had recently been involved in a payment dispute with the deceased; however, no one has been arrested in connection with his death. [1] ".

http://www.melbournecrime.bizhosting.com/john.furlan.htm details the following:

"On September 25, 2002, the Herald Sun reported that Domenico "Mick" Italiano was suspect in the Furlan muder. Italiano, is from the family of former Melbourne Godfather Domenico Italiano Italiano's house was bugged after the killing but rather than leading to a murder charge, the taps led to him being charged with defrauding charity raffles. Appearing in court on the raffle charges, Italiano said rumours have been rife about the car-bomb explosion which killed Furlan. After Juge Roland Williams lifted a suppression order on the the plea hearing in early September 2002, it was revealed by the Herald Sun that Italiano's lawyer Peter Chadwick said his client had once leased a car yard from John Furlan. It was next door to Mr Furlan's Sydney Road home and, after the business went bust, Italiano had to pay out the lease. Mr Chadwick told the court Italiano was investigated by police after Mr Furlan was killed and rumours spread through the car industry. "Those rumours are completely denied," he said. September 24, 2002: Mick Italiano in court Two hard-nosed businessmen who rigged the raffles of a children's charity admitted their fraud. The County Court heard prizes such as luxury cars were sold at discounted prices to friends and relatives before the two raffles were conducted. But the dodgy dealings of the Youth Motor Sport Foundation came unstuck when one of its directors was investigated by the homicide squad over the unsolved car bombing of a Melbourne mechanic. The foundation was established in 1997 to help disadvantaged children "grow through motor sport" but its first raffle recorded a $20,000 loss. Co-director Thomas Cherrie then suggested rigging the next raffle so a friend or relative would "win" a car. They would then pay the foundation an amount significantly less than the prize's retail price, the court heard. Cherrie, who has pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to defraud but is yet to be sentenced, told police the rigging was as simple as putting the pre-determined winning ticket on top of the pile of tickets. The first rigged raffle, in May 1998, resulted in Italiano's cousin Luigi Ponte, 33, of Keilor, "winning" a BMW 528 worth $100,000. Mr Ponte, who paid the foundation $74,200 for the car, was found not guilty by a jury after arguing he had no knowledge of the fraud. The same jury also found co-director Pasquale Laguda not guilty of two charges of conspiracy to defraud. The court heard that in a second raffle a business associate of Italiano won a Mercedes-Benz SL 500 after paying $180,000 for the car, which had a wholesale value of $240,000. Car dealer Mario Costanzo, 50, of Eltham, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud over the Mercedes-Benz and was fined $10,000 and sentenced to six months' jail, suspended for three years. Costanzo had agreed to become involved because Italiano owed him $60,000, which he could not repay. The court heard rigged foundation raffles resulted in another person "winning" a Bali holiday and a cleaner at Italiano's Richmond car yard "winning" a Mercedes-Benz. Prosecutor Rob Just told Judge Roland Williams a total of $513,700 had been collected in ticket sales for the two rigged raffles. Judge Williams sentenced Italiano, who pleaded guilty to three counts of conspiracy to defraud and who has lost his wife and business as a result of the offences, to 2 1/2 years' jail, of which all but six months was suspended for three years. Judge Williams said he wondered about the original intentions of the businessmen in becoming involved in children's charities. He said the dishonest scheming had resulted in the cheating of the public and the consequential erosion of public trust in such ventures that were intended to make money for good causes".

Thanks for your detailed work on this topic. PFClakkers (talk) 02:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Common Law templates

The image on Template:Criminal law is also found on about 1/2 dozen other Common Law templates. I'll look into it this afternoon. Thanks for the tip! BD2412 T 17:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson heights pic

Hi, can you help me out figure out the proper tag for Image:Jackson Heights 2.jpg? I'm not sure exactly which one to use. I took the photo myself around May 2005. Thanks- --Jleon 19:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image speedies

Thanks a million for picking out possible speedy delete candidates from among the 9000 unsourced images. Just a minor point, but it would help if you could add the relevant date to {{nosource}} when you tag for speedy (that should have been done by the editor who added {{nosource}}, but there you go...). Otherwise, keep up the good work! Physchim62 (talk) 08:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't mark images as speedy unless the uploader have actually been notified that his image lacks a source/license on his talk page. Many people forget to do this when applying the {{no source}} template in the first place. Thue | talk 15:44, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using my discretion there... A lot of images have been uploaded by users who are no longer active. And a lot of the time theyve been warned about this with other images theyve uploaded and done nothing... so if this is the case, I've not bothered with them. Also, If the images *isnt* a blatant copyvio then I usually put a message on the article talk page. The templates Ive been using are at User:Agnte/ImageCleanups Agnte 15:51, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am perfectly willing to speedy images if the uploader has been asked about other images and have not acted, or in very obvious cases. But in cases that are not completely clear-cut like Image:Jeremiah morrow bridge1.jpg you should post a message on the uploader talk page before marking speedy. Thue | talk 16:02, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, no problems. Agnte 16:07, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jarun

The picture is fair use but I dont know to put on picture that note after it is already uploaded. Luka Jačov 21:37, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jenin

Thanks for your note - it actually is not a picture I took; I found it off the internet from a source that had no information about copyright status, but in order to avoid complications I took it off the Jenin page. Thanks again from bringing it to my attention. Ramallite ^(talk) 05:13, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Jhhj.jpg

Thanks for the tip-off. I don't mean to pass the buck, but that image was uploaded by User:JoeM. I believe he's been unbanned now, so i'll leave it to him (?) to tag it. I just cropped the thing because it was too big! The rest of the images i have uploaded here (& on Commons) are tagged like a dog. Thanks, Hoshie | 08:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jovan Cvijic.png

Uroš Predić, who painted the painting died on February 11, 1953. So, if I get it right, this painting goes into PD in something like 18 years. Could it be licenced under fair-use until then, since it is by far the best portrait/photo of Jovan Cvijić? – Obradović Goran (ta^lk 21:35, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't have any source info, I only know that Uroć Predić painted it, since he is one of the most famous Serbian painters. This picture may even be in the PD, but I'm no expert, and I don't have the information. That would be all I can do to help... – Obradović Goran (ta^lk 21:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images

It'd be great if these kind of iamges had {{Non-free fair use in}} and the instructions on Wikipedia:Image description page were followed and a fair use rationale was provided. Popular culture and sports articles are particularly bad offenders when it comes to sourcing and following the rules for fair use.--nixie 10:58, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Aboriginal flag is the current ACOTF

Hi. You voted for Australian Aboriginal flag to be selected as Australian Collaboration of the fortnight. It has now been selected. Please improve it in any way you see fit. Thanks. --Scott Davis ^Talk 13:57, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I know this is a stupid question, but you are the first I've seen that's added a date to the {{no source}} tag on images. Do they work without the dates, or should I go back and add the date to all of images I've tagged this past week (I help out in the PUI area)? I'm sorry, I just never actually saw anything mention that, but it does explain the weird {{{{1}}}} thing that shows up. Thank you! :) --Foofy 01:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ahuh! it's not a stupid question, because the template was changed and as far as I can tell no instructions were issues on how to deal with it. Anyway, the usage i've been using is {{no source|~~~~~}} which automatically timestamps it, and makes it easier for admins to delete - but nothing gets automatically deleted around here, so you dont need to go back and re-do them. I've be backdating any timestamps that I see when working from the IUS area. Have a look at User:Agnte/ImageCleanups for the other templates ive been using. hope that helps. Agnte 07:59, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re my Joshua Tree image: this is a US government public domain image, I think I got it from the National Park Service Web site, but that's down right now so I can't check, and I can't figure out how to edit the page in question. (I'm also confused by the dates on the "this will be removed" warning--it looks as though this "will be removed" note is about ten days old, but it states a removal date in 2004.) The tag it should have is {{PD-USGov-Interior}}. Vicki Rosenzweig 21:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jwitherspoon.jpg

I got the image from his official website. i might have forgotten to add it to the copyright part. Omoo 18:31, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aussie Rules Footy photos

Hi, I have contributed some photos from the AFL and I want to make sure that I respect copyright. I uploaded a couple that I had taken at games and these seem to also have been deleted even though I specified that I was the copyright owner. See interules.gif for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biatch (talk • contribs)

It's deleted so I can't see it. If you took the picture, then i suggest uploading to Commons under a creative commons (free-ish) licence. Have a look at Image:KhyberPassPakistan.jpg for one of the images I've taken & uploaded. Agnte 21:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Senna image

Hi, thanks for checking the Senna image. The source had granted authorisation to use the image on Wikipedia. I updated the information and believe I tagged the image correctly now. If there's any problems leave me a message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gold333 (talk • contribs)

New York and Atlantic

Hi, I saw you listed the article on afd. There's no reason to place pages like this on afd unless you actually want it deleted, since anyone can just revert the redirect if they don't agree with it. - Bobet 16:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I closed it. Hopefully no one will complain. - Bobet 17:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Inquisition Myth

Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Inquisition Myth..

Delete. The title of this topic is POV. Agnte 10:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been renamed allready, everyone agrees the name is bad and needs to be renamed, but we can't do anything while the VfD is underway. Would you reconsider to change your vote to "rename"? --Stbalbach 13:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Agnte 13:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BD2412's RFA

Agnte, thanks for supporting my RfA - I'll do my best as an admin to help make the dream of Wikipedia into a reality! BD2412 T 21:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! BD2412 T 22:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your RFA support

Gday, Agnte! I've been on wikibreak for this past week, so here is a belated thank-you for your support in my successful RFA. I see you've had a few of these, so simply: Happy new year (if that's your kind of thing)! jnothman ^talk 18:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Goat

Yes I have drunk the beer, and it had some yeast sediment in the bottom of the bottle. Added to which the brewery claims the beer is unfiltered and unpasteurised - the requirements for a bottle conditioned beer, and RateBeer.Com has it listed as a bottle conditioned beer. The style of the beer is a bitter or pale ale. But calling an Australian beer a "bitter" might lead to confusion with those hoppy lagers the Aussie brewers call bitter. I changed what someone had listed as "real ale" into something more specific and verifiable (I suspect when served on draught it wouldn't qualify as Real Ale, which is a very limiting and strict CAMRA definition), though I didn't actually change the style. Cheers! SilkTork 18:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Real Ale. Yes, I agree that the term Real Ale is widely misunderstood. I have looked again at the page for Real Ale and made another adjustment which I hope will make the term a little clearer. It might be an idea if I adjust the entry in Mountain Goat to read Pale Ale as neither Real Ale or Bottle Conditioned is a beer style, which is what that beer box wants to say. All I was doing was going through Wiki and correcting sentences which mentioned Real Ale when Cask Ale was the more exact term. The Mountain Goat entry was awkward because the term Real Ale it was in that beer box under style. SilkTork 22:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Hi, just wanted to thank you for voting on my RFA, which went through with a count of (58/0/1), far better than I'd expected. I intend to take things slowly and start using the extra abilities gradually, but if there's anything I can do just leave a message. Cheers, CTOAGN (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper article

File:NPArticle.jpg

The picture as requested. Bobby1011 03:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't know the original source of the article, but I found it in "Australia through Time". Bobby1011 20:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australian meat pie

Thanks for removing the merge tags, Ewlyahoocom seems to be a merge fanatic, wants to make big difficult to read articles rather than have small articles that deal with a single idea. Alex Law 10:33, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Based on what I've seen from you on AfD, I think that you might have something to add to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cart00ney. I'd appreciate you weighing in on the matter in either direction. Savidan 19:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leunig

Hi,

you seem to be plugged into Wikipedia; can you try to get the Leunig page locked for a while? I'm getting tired of removing POV comments from a couple of editors, as I suspect you are.

I've nominated it for a lock, but it doesn't seem to have happened.

tks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.23.138.75 (talk • contribs)

Its now locked, but I doubt the current semi-protection lock isn't going to help - it only prevents editing by new or anonymous users, and our POV-pushers have legit accounts. Agnte 10:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well, it's a start. I will keep an eye on it too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.23.138.75 (talk • contribs)

Re:Yagan

Thanks for your comment at WP:AWNB. Much appreciated. Snottygobble 02:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks for your vote

My request for adminship passed with a final result of 78/2/0. Hopefully I will live up to everyone's expectations. Please ask if I can ever help out with anything in the future.
Martyman - 09:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your voting!

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very much, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dean McVeigh

I have edited this article removing unverified stuff and adding verifiable material from sources such as newspapers. I would be grateful if you could take a look. Capitalistroadster 09:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup in March

I see that you are listed as a participant in the WikiProject Melbourne. If you are a Melbourne resident I would appreciate your views on the suggested Meetup in March . Please give some indication of your interest, or otherwise, in the idea. Even a simple "No thanks" with your user name would be welcome and assist in assessing the level of support for a meetup. Thank you.. Cuddy Wifter 06:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beefart thanks you.

RfA Thanks

Thank you for voting on my RfA, it passed with a final tally of 68/0/0 so I'm now an administrator. If there's anything I can do to help, you feel I've done something wrong, or there's just something you want to tell, don't hesitate to use my talk page. Thanks. - Bobet 10:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of my RfA

Thank you for your support of my successful request for adminship. I am honoured that the nomination was supported unanimously and that the community expressed confidence that I would use the tools wisely. If you have any concerns please let me know on my talk page. Regards A Y Arktos 01:56, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi. I've added Lee Torney to the Melbourne gangland killings and increased the count to 35. - Richardcavell 01:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - you are absolutely WRONG to count Torney's death as one of the gangland killings & to do so is extremely prejudicial to a current trial - Ferris 007

Katelyn Faber

Could you weigh in at the bottom of the Talk Page for Katelyn Faber regarding the inclusion of an image of her? User:Tufflaw, who unsuccessfully tried to have the entire article deleted back in December 2005 insists on censoring/deleting it for extremely specious reasons, and I've been asked to gather a consensus. Please read the bottom two sections of that page. Thanks. Nightscream 19:01, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beer cats & kittens

It has been suggested by User:BrianSmithson and supported by User:Syrthiss that the Beer and brewery categories should be renamed. This proposal has been supported and expanded by myself. The notion is that the regional categories should follow the format of "Beer and breweries in Africa" /Europe/Asia/North America/South America/Oceania. "Brewers and breweries" could also be renamed "Beer and breweries by region". And all the countries should also be renamed (and merged if needed) as, for example, "Beer and breweries of Germany", "Beer and breweries of Britain", "Beer and breweries of Poland". The word in each case would be beer rather than beers to allow for general articles on beer culture in each region as well as individual beers.

Comments, suggestions, objections, free beer and simple votes to Wiki Beer Project SilkTork 15:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Resolving conflict

Hi Agnte. We had a conversation in Feb about Mountain Goat. People in the Wiki Beer Project feel that my editing style is causing problems. Looking back at my record I am inclined to agree that I may have been a bit arrogant in my editing, and perhaps in my dealings with people. It was never my intention to be rude, or to appear as though I was taking matters into my own hand without regard for others, but I can see that it has happened. I wish to apologise if any any point in our contact you felt I was being dismissive of your views, or was pushing my own views onto you. I would welcome your feedback. And I would like to know if you feel the matter regarding Mountain Goat has been resolved to your satisfaction, or if there are still issues there that we need to talk about. Best wishes SilkTork 20:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beer poll

Your vote/opinion on brewery notability is requested here: [1] SilkTork 12:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alphonse-Gangitano.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alphonse-Gangitano.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 12:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jason-Moran-Death-ABCTV2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jason-Moran-Death-ABCTV2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 12:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Graham-Kinniburgh.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Graham-Kinniburgh.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 12:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Andrew-Veniamin-and-Carl-Williams.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Andrew-Veniamin-and-Carl-Williams.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 12:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bulletin-Badfellas.jpg

I have tagged Image:Bulletin-Badfellas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 13:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Jill-Singer.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jill-Singer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PaulBarry.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PaulBarry.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:LongfordExplosion-Small.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LongfordExplosion-Small.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 13 October 2012
Last: 23 July 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 November 2012
Last: 13 October 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 14:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney meetup invitation: January 2013

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 January 2013
Last: November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Wikipedia trainers requested in New South Wales

Wikimedia Australia is looking for experienced Wikipedians to help out at training sessions across New South Wales, in particular in Newcastle, Wollongong, Port Macquarie and in Parkes. If you're interested, the details are at the following link:

http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaau-l/2013-July/003677.html

We'd love to see you there! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney September 2013 edit-a-thon invite

Sydney Meetup
Next: 21 September 2013
Last: Higher Ed Symposium

Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

Invitation

There is a backstage pass coming up to be followed by an editathon in the State Library of New South Wales on 23 November. This is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and will be a special opportunity because the Library is providing: one of its best rooms; its expert curators (along with their expertise and their white gloves); a newly launched website (containing new resources); and of course, items from its collection (including rare and usually unavailable material) which we can look at, learn from, and use, to improve WP articles. For example, on the chosen topic (Australia and WWI), the Library holds many diaries and manuscripts from the period.

As you can see from the Library's project page, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us. Please sign up on the editathon project page if you can participate either online or in person with other Wikipedians. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:34, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been delivered using AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Sydney.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Nomination of Mountain Goat Beer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mountain Goat Beer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Goat Beer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]