Talk:Yangban

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Image for Yangban

I think the image Image:Yangban party.jpg is quite misleading. The only Yangban in the drawing is at lying at the top-right corner, and he does not really represent a typical Yangban. According to [1], the title of the drawing is related to farming and farmers. //Memming 19:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, please feel free to change it for a better one. (I thought it was fairly clear that the yangban was the person in the top right). -- Visviva 23:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But Yangban didn't work so much? with their prerogative? I think this is good picture and should be left and add another pic as well. - 10:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

The Time

The time should be until 1910. This system was abolished or had not been adopted under Japan rule. - 10:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

The yangban was not a system, it was a social identity. And really the yangban were very much intact up until 1945. Soul Slayer 07:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

The article, especially the introduction, takes a rather anti-yangban tone; literally the first sentence calls them "parasitic." Whatever your opinion of them (I haven't the information to form one myself), surely the yangban deserve an objective treatment. Wikipedia does not adopt this kind of tone even with regard to the Nazis. Lockesdonkey (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yangban today

In my visits to Korea, I've heard people refer to themselves (or family) as Yangban. Like the rest of this article, I could not give you a citation to this thought. But I wanted to bring it up so that the tags don't get too old and thereby deleted by some enterprising editor who thinks tags should have discussion backing them up (without which they get deleted.)--S. Rich (talk) 04:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most modern Koreans with famous Yangban family name are fake descendants

The most common 3 Korean surnames, Kim, Lee and Park are famous Yangban families and ironically, most of them now are fake descendants. Lots of peasant people have forged their surname and these famous surnames were their main target. As the result, every single Korean has become Yangban blarblar. It is a great irony of Korean history. Fewer but not so famous Korean surnames are much more likely to be real descendants

What jobs did yangban have?

I dont see many information about yangban jobs, just names but not much information like what other jobs did they hold? And what did they did in those? 192.254.97.79 (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article is in an awful state

Poor grammar, WP:OR, poor sourcing, and poor reference formatting. This article is one of the most important topics in Korean history, why is it in such poor shape? seefooddiet (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because many Korean editors dont know how the enwiki works + other editors aren't as interested. -- 00101984hjw (talk) 04:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]