Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Mirengoff

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. Postdlf 07:10, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Mirengoff

Reasonably large number of google hits - but he's a blogger, so there would be. No evidence of notability in the article. Is this guy worth an article, or is it just big name no blanket? Grutness|^hello? 07:47, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 08:14, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable. Quale 08:23, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. With a legitimate inbound link from Power Line (blog), which is highly notable among blogs, it shouldn't be considered vanity. Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Samaritan 13:12, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep and Expand Member of PowerLine, one of the most popular and notable blogs there is. It broke the story of the use of fraudulent documents by CBS News about President Bush's time in the national guard. The reason that he gets a number of hits is because PowerLine is a highly influential blog which was Time Magazine's blog of the year. According to the TruthLaidBear ecosystem, PowerLine is in the top 10 list for blogs with 61,000 visitors. He is definitely worth an article and I will work on expanding this one.Capitalistroadster 19:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep Organic Growth. Klonimus 04:04, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Have expanded the article. Capitalistroadster 05:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Time Magazine's Blogger of the Year and thank you Roadster. Kappa 07:30, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, bloggercruft. Grue 16:56, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability. The notable content isn't about the person and is already in the Power Line (blog) article.Tobycat 02:38, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Generic bio-stuff, nothing that can't go in the Power Line article. Gamaliel 08:23, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.