User talk:I am sexy
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing. Maximus Rex 04:30, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- That was not vandalism but just some tests to learn the wiki. I am sexy 20:20, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- In that case, you might consider applying your learning to contributing to the project, rather than simply posting comments which I suspect you know full well will be controversial and considered trolling. - IMSoP 20:32, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
THis is your second warning. The topics you are posting on the Village pump are not encyclopedic and therefore considered vandalisms. If you keep this up, you will be blocked Dori | Talk 20:27, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Change your username and starting writing encyclopedic topics and we can be friends. Dori | Talk 20:35, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
- You let the other fellows play wikichess but you delete my WikiSex page. I can't understand this, chess and sex are both a way to socialize with the fellows. I am sexy 20:37, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Apart from the fact that those chess games are themselves controversial, may I suggest one obvious difference? The users involved there have made substantial contributions to the community and the project, and could be said to have earned a little relaxation as reward. This account, however, has only been used for "tests" which destroyed existing articles, insults [1] and now "WikiSex". - IMSoP 20:43, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- That wasn't an insult, only an opinion, and I will contribute in the future after I make friends here. I make friends by having virtual sex with them, but Dori censored my socialization attempts. Maybe she is afraid of sex.. Shame on her. I am sexy 20:47, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Maybe you should try to make friends here without having sex with them? -- till we *) 21:04, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
No, I like sex. I am sexy 21:08, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Okay -- but maybe then Wikipedia isn't the right place for you? Assuming that you're not just trolling: If you can't imagine to make friends or to cooperate without sex, what is your position on a project mainly about cooperative encyclopedic work (without involvement of sex)? -- till we *) 22:52, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
WikiSex
[edit]Discussion moved from Village Pump
Hello guys and girls! I am a bisexual (mostly lesbian) feminist open-minded WikiWoman. If you like to have virtual sex over the net, please click here: WikiSex. I need sexy virtual partners, preferably women! I am sexy 20:01, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a chat room, so this isn't approbiate here. But I would say, we shouldn't censor the announcement, only the content, so I reversed the deletion of the announcement. -- till we *) 20:46, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- As long as you allow WikiChess, you should also allow WikiSex. Either ban or allow both. Your fellows are playing chess on the wiki and this is clearly not encyclopedic, but you allow it. I can't understand this. Both chess and sex are ways to socialize with people, but now you censored my socialization attempts. I am sexy 20:50, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- The problem is, you shouldn't answer a request with another of your own. It really doesn't help your case. In a community-driven site, it is best to not alienate the community, no? --Wirehead 02:47, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
My contribution!
[edit]I contributed an article! It's here: virtual sex. Some jerks implied it's ok to play chess here if you have contributed but not to have virtual sex if you haven't contributed anything. So, I contributed a real article to show you I can really be useful here. Please un-delete my WikiSex page. I am sexy 21:08, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Further up the page, you claimed that calling all sysops trolls was not an insult. Do you make the same claim about calling me a jerk? Also, you will note that I said "substantial contributions", and was very careful to distance myself from the opinion that this was sufficient mitigation. Simply creating a single stub does not give you the right to use Wikipedia's resources however you see fit. - IMSoP 21:35, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
You wouldn't happen to know 141, would you? —67.69.189.172 21:11, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
No, I don't know this person. Why do you ask? I am sexy 21:13, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Just curious. &mdash67.69.189.172 21:32, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
and who are you? are you 141? I am sexy 21:40, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize user pages. That can lead to an immediate ban.--Eloquence* 21:53, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
Okay I will not do that again. But no real harm was done: it was immediately reverted, and I'm not about to continue it. It was just a moment's impulse. I am sexy 21:56, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- It strikes me that everything you've done has been "just a moment's impulse". Perhaps you would be more welcomed if you gave your actions a little more consideration. - IMSoP 22:05, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- You were blocked. I just unblocked you (well, Martin did, same difference).
- I assume that your vandalism was, as you say, a one off thing. I'd suggest not making the same mistake twice - though you have permission to vandalise my user page if you like. :) --Lucinda
Hey
[edit]Hey i just want to find out more about you, respond on my talk page. Comrade Nick
18, Male, Vegas Comrade Nick
You? Comrade Nick
Kühl I could speak german (althought its not that good!) :>)
Ja Comrade Nick
from da pump
[edit]- I've blocked this user. No clearer case of a reincarnation of a account-for-vandalism-or-trolling-only can surely exist (oh, I'll be proved wrong on that one in about ten minutes, I guess). -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 22:05, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I unblocked hir. Clearer cases exist. Martin 22:07, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I think zie's doing a fine job! Marnanel 22:20, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
- And for being multiple people [2] - you're really confusing me now. Seriously, though, I disagree with your assumption of good faith on this one - look over the history of that account carefully; also, note that it appears to be acting as some kind of magnet for borderline trolls/problem users. But then, perhaps being called a jerk on the User_Talk page has made me a little biased, I dunno. - IMSoP 22:31, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I've (re)read the past contribs. I still don't feel a block was warranted. Catch me in IRC if you want a fuller explanation (bearing andy's advice in mind ;-)). Martin 00:08, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Message
[edit]No offense, but "I am sexy" is a point of view term. You may consider yourself sexy but others may not. Try "I think I am sexy" that is correct in all senses, unless you showed a picture of yourself to every wikipedian (not advised) and a consensus was reached you cannot claim you are indeed sexy. GrazingshipIV 01:31, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Or how about "I am modest"? Deb 17:40, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Indeed. As long as the perception of oneself isn't merely self-congratulatory, it's clearly NPOV ;-) --I am worthless 18:56, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)
I agree, you ought to put a photo-especially if you are sexy. -
I've restored this as it was deleted out of process. Secretlondon 20:23, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
You are insane, but put a smile on my face. On the other hand, anyone that has been to a chat room knows that if you say you are a girl and like mostly girls, you are more likely to be a man than a bi or lesbian girl. --Me.
- Perhaps you haven't participated in any real hardcore chat rooms yet. I am sexy 22:27, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Perhaps you missed the point ;) GrazingshipIV 22:39, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)
- pimpslap* Lirath Q. Pynnor
Don't be discouraged
[edit]I saw your posting on the village pump about not feeling welcome here. As I understand it, there were some misunderstandings earlier. Please don't get discouraged. Because of the ever-present problems of sockpuppets accounts, new users who make 'controversial' edits tend to recieve more scrutiny. Be aware that there are some people who take this project more seriously than others. I love to joke around on the wikipedia pages, but don't joke around in the articles. Once you've established yourself here, I think you'll find it a nice place with an inviting community. →Raul654 00:27, Apr 8, 2004 (UTC)
- PS - I like lesbians ;)
Help me cool down pleeeeeeaaaaaase ! I am in your room now. 195.92.198.74 00:46, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- want some fuck? :-) I am sexy 00:48, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- You are so crude! I'm a nice girl I am, go to your virtual room. I am Hot! 00:50, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I am 23, come talk to me here where everyone can see I am Hot! 00:57, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
A new Quickpoll is in place to stop you from turning Wikipedia into a joke. Danny 01:35, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
please
[edit]can you please find something better to do. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Kingturtle 02:12, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Tja, Ich kenne ein bischen Deutsch; aber meine Deutsch ist naturlich schlecht. Lirath Q. Pynnor
24 hour ban
[edit]As per the results of the Quickpoll (13 support, 2 opposed), I taken action. Your account is blocked for 24 hours. Kingturtle 02:41, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia forks
[edit]I found your community unfriendly and unsuitable for open-minded people like me. I was blocked by Ed Poor who also deleted my user pages without any quickvote, and several people called me a troll and want to delete my WikiSex page. I hope they won't want to delete my WikiJournal in the future, but you never can know with suchs charcacters! I really think many sysops here are trolls or control freaks. Having faced your sysops' hate, I think it may be better to say goodbye and find a home in some Wikipedia fork. Please introduce me to some wikipedia fork where I can edit articles and meet friendly people who have humor. I am sexy 23:59, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Please go here. They'll love you. Dori | Talk 00:26, Apr 8, 2004 (UTC)
- No they won't. I am Hot! 23:06, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Just a very quick note: I fear I am one of those who assumed you were up to no good, and while you haven't exactly proven me wrong, I may have been hasty in my judgement, in which case I apologise. I am not, however, a sysop/admin, and would like to suggest that you are making an artificial distinction between admins/sysops and normal users in terms of behaviour: both "categories" contain people of all descriptions, although it is naturally hoped that those who gain sysop/admin status will mainly fall toward the "better" end of the spectrum. TINC - IMSoP 00:39, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Sexy - I am an admin. I hope you haven't found me unfriendly. Most admins are not control freaks. IMO most admins, simply try to do their best for the encylopedia. I found you page a lot of fun, though I do have to get back to regular editting. It will get deleted, that is very clear. I think it harmless, but too many others disagree. As for who I am, I created this sockpuppet to hide my identity. I have a few people in particular (trolls, trouble makers and out and out nutters) who I don't want to know who I am. I was very careful, I reactivated an old freeserve dialup account so that I had a different IP, I did not vote in either the quickpoll or the VfD poll as my real self. I did not edit the page as my realself, I did not block, unblock, delete or undelete as my realself.I am not Lir, Secret London, My red dice, or anyone you have ever met. You will never find out who I am, so you can stop guessing. I am Hot! 23:06, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
re: slow servers
[edit]The servers and their improvements are paid for by user donations. Take a moment some time to help us by making a donation at http://wikimediafoundation.org/fundraising , if possible. Thanks, Kingturtle 00:13, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Babelfish
[edit].. hat wirklich seine Spuren auf deiner Benutzerseite hinterlassen - you made my night. Find ich cool :) -- da didi 23:27, 7 May 2004 (UTC)