Talk:New Testament
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New Testament article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Bibliography: 177
[edit]I looked up the quote from Bruce Metzger: a textual commentary on The Greek New Testament, and at least the 4th edition don’t have this quote in the page 367, someone please change this quote or look up for the correct one, I couldn’t find it. HBelk (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
ESV Study Bible in lead seems odd
[edit]Better to stick to academic sources for the lead it seems to me. 2600:100C:B0A7:CABD:7D21:CBBA:225D:EEDF (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Top-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Bible articles
- Top-importance Bible articles
- WikiProject Bible articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Top-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment