Talk:Freedom Force vs the 3rd Reich

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Freedom Force vs the 3rd Reich article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Freedom Force vs the 3rd Reich" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1: 120 days

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Mods

I liked the mods on this game, the sound never played in dcug for instance. How can I get the sound to work? Tinks its a service pack problem. Was trying to do marvel vs dc until it broke (sounds) somehow. gbtm. l8er. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.42.105 (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Characters as Cruft?

The characters in this game were recently deleted as gamecruft. This confuses me, since similar game articles are fairly consistent about listing prominent characters, especially the playable ones (e.g. Marvel Ultimate Alliance, Street Fighter II). My question is, are those other articles bad examples that need to be corrected on their respective pages? Or perhaps the characters in this article can be placed back in, only with less detailed descriptions? What's the policy we're referencing here? Thanks! -BaronGrackle (talk) 16:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]