Talk:XML pipeline

[Please. Could we have some context here? It is unclear whether this is about the Alaska oil pipeline or computer software or something else? An educated reader who reads the sentence above would not find the answer. You could start with "In software...", etc. (if in fact that's what this is).] Michael Hardy

[The first sentence seems very explanatory that this is a software construct] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.137.184.81 (talk) 23:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When I came here just now the opening clause reads "in computer science". Since computer science is the theoretical side of computing that's not really correct. In software would be better. I shall amend. Rob Burbidge (talk) 13:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page has a lot of dead links.

This page under the "product specific" section has a huge number of dead or misdirected links. The first three I checked were broken. Anyone who wants to fix that up would be appreciated. I might be able to do it later, but wanted to say "hey this is broken" in case someone else beats me to it. Sesquiannual (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on XML pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]