Talk:S

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the S article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 12 months

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Turkish S cedilla

In Related letters, the Turkish S cedilla is missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.247.248.111 (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's mentioned at "S with diacritics". (CC) Tbhotch^™ 16:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ 175.100.12.15 (talk) 11:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the long S from the front Quick Fact section, it's misleading, make a section for it!!

It's misleading to place the long s in the quick section area, it's not used anymore. Imagine you are an alien and you are trying to learn the Latin alphabet, you are going to get the impression that the long s is the widely used lowercase letter. We should talk about it in a section. Restfultree2022 (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Restfultree2022: I agree that the long s should not be given equal prominence in the infobox; I have moved it to the "variations" parameter. There is already a section about the long s. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the introduction is not consistent.

Read along the path, all the introductions except this are written in full form of ordinary number like seventeenth, eighteenth but this is written as 19th. I suggest there should be a minor change from 19th to nineteenth to ensure consistency. 2001:EE0:4BC7:1FE0:3DA6:7723:C1A5:5A75 (talk) 12:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed. Shantavira|^{feed me} 14:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]