Talk:Sound Forge

Professional sound production Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Written by the Sony Marketing Division? Does anybody who is familiar with SF care to make this NPOV?

--Samjappy 18:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

POV

I don't see how any of what was written was POV. Saying that it is powerful is the only thing I can see that might be considered POV but it is a relativley powerful audio editing suite. Other things like saying it has 24bit/192kHz capabilities is not pov, it is fact. It can syncronise video frame by frame and it can support a wide variety of file formats. Maybe wide is a pov word because one mans wide is another mans narrow, but it certainly covers most of the major ones so I think most people would agree it is a wide variety. There may be pov in there, but in removing it you also removed all of the npov factual features of the program. If you want to mae it npov then do that without getting rid of all the good stuff. Borb 13:26, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Borb is right. There's nothign POV about the article as he wrote it. Sound Forge woops the proverbial lammah's arse when it comes to sound editing. The software/features description is pretty accurate Project2501a 11:42, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re-confirmed as of July 2009. The article is quite humble considering the impact this tool has had in the parts of the audio industry I'm familiar with. JoaCHIP (talk) 22:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Features list

Why do people keep removing the features list? First there was dispute that the article was POV, now it most certainly is not, yet people still keep removing the features list. If you have a point to make, use this talk page. Borb 20:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mac Compatiblity?

Does sound forge work on macs (OS X)? Gewehr

Notability

About notability, I recommend adding some information on how many people or companies have bought the software, how much money the company has made on it, what notable companies use it, etc. Also, it'd be cool to see the features converted into paragraph format, with context, answering the question of "why do all these features matter?". --Fang Aili ^talk 19:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cracked by who?

Who is DeepzOne? is it Microsoft?

Version 10

Version 10 is out now! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.116.52.77 (talk) 19:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sound Forge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]