Talk:List of Boeing 767 operators

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airline project.

update

I want to updae the list of the operator and i'm wondering about the best source ?

Article layout

I split out the former and current operators into two different sections but User:Zaps93 doesnt like it. As this should be a matter of concensus not opinion has anybody any suggestions (as most of these list of articles dont have a standard layout). I do think the list needs more information my main objections to the old style was the repeating many times of the term Boeing 767 which wasnt really needed and it was not allways clear who are the current operators. Any suggestions? MilborneOne (talk) 15:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the fact that was not me, but my cousin (under my user). I myself actually believe we have a table drawn up showing operators of a certain typer. E.g.

**List of Boeing 767 operators**
Airline	Boeing 767-200	Boeing 767-200ER	Boeing 767-200F	Boeing 767-300	Boeing 767-300ER	Boeing 767-300F
British Airways	0	0	0	0	21	0

I will be happy enough to spend time and draw this up, and also make a table for past operators and types, I believe this is a good idea to give people clearer and better way of viewing it. Also as you can see it is clearer than just British Airways, it states type operated and country all in a chart. Also I apologize for my cousins actions. Thank You. Zaps93 (talk) 15:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still think it would be good to have information on when operated in the former operators. Need to make it clear if the figures are the maximum operated and stuff like that. But I would be OK if you want to change the list to a table. MilborneOne (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You MilborneOne. I will start right away. Any futher suggestions please do put down in my talk or this discussion page. Thank You again. Zaps93 (talk) 15:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to add Air New Zealand to the list... they have 5 300ER's

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Boeing 767 operators. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150325201519/https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/Mezzi/velivoliDotazione/Pagine/KC_767A.aspx to http://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/Mezzi/velivoliDotazione/Pagine/KC_767A.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New source available for operator list

A new edition of the Flightglobal airliner census that was used as the source for the operator list has been published, so someone should probably update the table with that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.87.122 (talk) 09:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Former operators situation

There was a removal of all former operators of the Boeing 767, so someone should do the same thing with the chart as the Airbus A340, 330 and the Boeing 777 operatos chart by listing both current and former operators with current operators in green and former operators in red with the number they have currently or before they retired. Loveheart547 (talk) 14:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]