Talk:Psychonautics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Psychonautics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Altered States of Consciousness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of altered states of consciousness on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Altered States of ConsciousnessWikipedia:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessTemplate:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessAltered States of Consciousness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 2 March 2010, see discussion.
keep, 28 April 2008, see discussion.

POV in text under photo of Aldous Huxley

The phrase considered by some a leader of modern thought and an intellectual of the highest rank is POV, not to mention vague (who is it that considers him such?). Perhaps it should explain why he is significant in terms of the subject rather than using such language. (I.e. what has he done to be considered a psychonaut.) Autarch (talk) 18:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notable psychonauts

I propose removing that section entirely. I doubt that all these people are especially known for their psychonaucy, in some cases I doubt we're allowed to call them psychonauts at all; the actually notable ones can be covered in the article, indeed one or more are already linked to in the text. If really necessary and accurate, I think we can add a sentence including a handful of names someplace else in the article. The list gives no explanations as to what makes these people notable psychonauts, like whether they have written about the topic extensively or if they just like to get high every now and then. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 23:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's been nagging at me since I first did some cleanup and watchlisted this article. Seems like rather than Psychonaut, the relevant category on the associated articles is usually Category:Psychedelic drug advocates, not always directly supported in the article but usually commonly known to be true. I suggest that the best solution would be to create List of psychedelic drug advocates and reference that here. At least that's a more objective criteria; psychonaut as it is used here is relatively subjective, and for living people shouldn't be used I think unless the subject uses the term themselves. Yworo (talk) 00:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed the section. In case there was anything useful in there, putting the list here:

Extended content

Notable psychonauts

Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963)

Timothy Leary (1920 - 1996)

Two iconic psychonautical researchers and advocates of the 20th century.

— Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 07:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Psychonauts Missing

The Notable Psychonauts seem to address only those who explored via drugs, yet there are citations that meditation and prayer are also valid methods.

For example, Rabbi Akiva should surely be considered a notable psychonaut as he used meditation and prayer to access levels that others were incapable of achieving. See for example http://ascentofsafed.com/cgi-bin/ascent.cgi?Name=pardes - "[only] Rabbi Akiva entered in peace and left in peace. "

Should I add him? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.201.166 (talk) 08:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@79.182.201.166: He seems to be less a psychonaut and more a (more or less normal) religious person. I'd oppose adding him besides if you have a ver ygood WP:RS explicitly calling him a psychonaut. --Fixuture (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see Hamilton Morris on the list, But i dont want to add due to maybe unwelcome reception DANIELTHEDON (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Psychonautics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NOT TRUE!

Alcohol is not the most common harmful substance that can be avoided by poisoning dildo. It does not guarantee that it is just before the end. I have a concept of "Psychonaut" (UFO Eater) which is about 11 years old. Thanks to David No, my work and help are great. Tom Tan. In this game around the chocolate box, south of Gondwana, with Tamtama. We are a dry desert. Thanks to David Icke and Lasagne for their love for them. I did something wrong in doing bad things in the abuse box. I first heard about my responsibility five years ago. He is the only person. Because he stood with the insurgents in some places, he could not survive. When I learned about the time I was using at Power David, it was expected that it would not turn black in the darkness of the giraffe. On August 13th, I was holding an annual conference that focused on community action. No, we do not plan to do this. "Video video." They in turn focused their attention on the entire background because our questions about the alphabet, not our common problems, are a perfect and correct word! Tam Tam David his arrogant son Ikuke said: "I have a wonderful thing to offend him. I want to call him a proud friend." I think Punk and Gwando will make very simple words and words with the correct name. Maybe your Gbanana will have this correct idea. The reader is always clearer than you think. But in terms of judgement and women, Tan has more. If you think you have uploaded the actions you want to perform using the main digital computer the way you want, this dialog will guide you through the previous steps. More important than the average story. Also, the part that Autumn and some of us show is part of the main mosaic, but their similarity lies in the collapse of us and others. . That's right We have time to feel angry at the Tamtam proposal. This is a good time. The news of the Tamtan Ministry was very difficult and had a great influence on the results and strength. Reading this video is easy to understand. In the same way, you lose your strength and strength. So, if new notifications are needed, the connection will begin. 105.4.2.77 (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow i actually laughed trying to understand this (no offense meant), either this is Writing under influence, or just some type of talk i dont understand DANIELTHEDON (talk) 21:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]