User talk:Lproven
Open tasks:
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
==
[edit]TS1000 entry
[edit]Hi, thanks for starting the TS1000 article! Since Wikipedia's Page history feature records time/name stamps, I removed your stamp from the text. A click at the article's Page history link (left margin or above/below the article) reveals all, incl diffs. --Wernher 10:06, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments! I've amended it slightly to make links point to more useful places. Liam Proven 00:31, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
OT
[edit]Good to see you finally use your userinfo page - your link has been red on my page for too long :) sheridan 20:21, 2004 Dec 23 (UTC) - Ta! I actually never noticed it before... Then only when bored decided to put something there! :¬) Liam Proven 21:03, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eva Green, you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla 15:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- I object in the strongest possible terms to the accusation of vandalism. I carefully edited the page to use an image already in use on another Wikipedia page; how is that vandalism? If the image is suitable for use on one page, why is it not suitable for use on another? I am not interested in your dedication to Wikipedia, if you fling insults like this at established editors/contributors, you are destroying the very collaborative institution of Wikipedia itself. Furthermore, if you are so concerned about rights and legal issues, then why do you not identify yourself and instead hide behind a pseudonym? Liam Proven 17:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Your edit here specifically removed a warning that stated you were to read WP:FUC before adding an image there. It noted that promotional images and Casino Royale screenshots were inappropriate and would result in an immediate block. You specifically removed that warning and replaced it with a promotional image from Casino Royale. It is hard to imagine this was anything other than a deliberate violation of our fair-use policy. Your personal attacks are in violation of WP:NPA and if they continue, you will be blocked. --Yamla 13:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
OpenDOS
[edit]A {{prod}} template has been added to the article OpenDOS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Whispering 17:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
WP Zimbabwe
[edit]
|
You have been invited to join the WikiProject Zimbabwe, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Zimbabwe. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading! |
Part 12:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Non-PC compatible x86 computers
[edit]Regarding Non-PC compatible x86 computers, which was deleted, (or is it Non-PC compatible X86 computers?)... have you tried an undeletion request? --Trevj (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In West African Lungfish, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Posterior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Pye Ltd., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High tension (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Rackets (sport) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Trinity College, Royal Naval College and Wraxall
- Real tennis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Newcastle
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Overlinking
[edit]Hi Lproven. Please can you be more conservative with your linking (see WP:OVERLINK)? In Lord Howe Island you linked quite a few very common English words, which is beyond what our style guides suggest. I took a look at some of your other contribs, and it seems you may not be aware of this guide. --99of9 (talk) 01:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- And as a result I see that you have removed all of my edits, AFAICT, such as the link to the LHISI on the obscure word "phasmid" which most people would not know. That is it - the last straw. I have had enough. I am sick of being queried. I have been called a vandal, long, well-researched articles have been deleted and now my contributions are being questioned repeatedly. I stopped writing original content for WP years ago after being called a vandal; now simple copy-editing is being undone. Sod this for a game of soldiers. I am extremely offended and angered by this. I am resigning from editing wikipedia forthwith. Liam Proven (talk) 12:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi! I've not researched the articles in question but I'm sure this'd be a great shame. I understand that one of the Wikimedia Foundation's goals is to retain editors. If you'd please hang around a few days longer to reconsider, there may be some further advice to be offered. Have a nice weekend anyway! Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- PS A search has found something which may be of interest, and I expect there are policies and channels here too if you'd like to take up issues with others. I'll continue to have a further look aorund and post again over the coming days. -- Trevj (talk) 14:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Liam, I'm sorry you feel this way, but I think you have misread what I did and said. Firstly, I am certainly not calling you a vandal, I am simply asking you to be more conservative with wikilinking. I have no doubt you did it in good faith. Surely it's ok to "query"? This is a collaborative wiki after all, and the links I removed seemed to me to be inconsistent with the style guide WP:OVERLINK. What would you prefer me to have done? Secondly, I did not remove all of your edit, in fact I kept the exact example (phasmid) that you refer to. The net result of our edits shows that I have retained your non-common words content. Please reconsider your reaction, I certainly have no intention to drive you away. --99of9 (talk) 22:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Novell DOS
[edit]If it's of any interest, I've found some additional sources and recreated Novell DOS. You may be legitimately sceptical about the longevity of that page but hopeully will feel like keeping an eye on it every now and then for a few months. -- Trevj (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Invitation to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hello! Lproven,
you are invited to join other editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! -- Trevj (talk) 14:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CGOL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algebraic notation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
iGolaware Linux AFD
[edit]Just thought I'd let you know about this article's AFD --Slashme (talk) 13:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christmas and holiday season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Lproven. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Lproven. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Lproven. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nemopteridae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Peters Plus, Ltd. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No claim of notability, no sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:10, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Lproven. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Johnson-Davies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medical Research Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brumov-Bylnice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanesque.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Mallard BASIC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NSOFT
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)